Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T12:17:19.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meeting Newell's other challenge: Cognitive architectures as the basis for cognitive engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

Wayne D. Gray*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Department, CogWorks Laboratory, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590 http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/ http://www.rpi.edu/~schoem/ http://www.rpi.edu/~myersc/
Michael J. Schoelles*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Department, CogWorks Laboratory, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590 http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/ http://www.rpi.edu/~schoem/ http://www.rpi.edu/~myersc/
Christopher W. Myers*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Department, CogWorks Laboratory, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590 http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/ http://www.rpi.edu/~schoem/ http://www.rpi.edu/~myersc/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We use the Newell Test as a basis for evaluating ACT-R as an effective architecture for cognitive engineering. Of the 12 functional criteria discussed by Anderson & Lebiere (A&L), we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of ACT-R on the six that we postulate are the most relevant to cognitive engineering.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003