Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:25:39.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metaphor muddles in communication theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2003

Drew Rendall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada d.rendall@uleth.ca paul.vasey@uleth.ca http://home.uleth.ca/~d.rendall http://www.psych.uleth.ca/People/Vasey/Vasey.html
Paul Vasey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta T1K 3M4, Canada d.rendall@uleth.ca paul.vasey@uleth.ca http://home.uleth.ca/~d.rendall http://www.psych.uleth.ca/People/Vasey/Vasey.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Shanker & King (S&K) argue that information-theoretic approaches to communication are too rigid to capture the ebb and flow of communicative interactions. They advocate instead a dynamic systems approach based on the metaphor of dance. We focus on two problems arising from the dance metaphor: first, that its inherently cooperative tone contradicts basic tenets of behavioral biology; and second, that it risks obscuring rather than clarifying the details of communicative interactions.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press