Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T10:27:46.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The need to consider additional variables when summarizing agrammatism research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2001

M. Cherilyn Young
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. cherilyn@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu jhutchi603@aol.com uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cyoung
Judith A. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. cherilyn@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu jhutchi603@aol.com uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cyoung
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Throughout the history of aphasiology, researchers have identified important premorbid and stroke-related predictors of linguistic performance. Although Grodzinsky discusses some of these variables, exclusion of other variables could lead to unnecessary experimental error and erroneous conclusions. Aspects to consider include sources of experimental bias, premorbid differences, nonlinguistic roles of the frontal regions, and comparison of normal and aphasic performance.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press