Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:35:54.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New-feature learning: How common is it?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Robert M. French
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium rfrench@ulg.ac.be
Mark Weaver
Affiliation:
Corvus Development, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI weaver@corvusdev.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The fixed-feature viewpoint Schyns et al. are opposing is not a widely held theoretical position but rather a working assumption of cognitive psychologists – and thus a straw man. We accept their demonstration of new-feature acquisition, but question its ubiquity in category learning. We suggest that new-feature learning (at least in adults) is rarer and more difficult than the authors suggest.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press