Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T16:56:38.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On gradience and optionality in non-native grammars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Antonella Sorace
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LN, Scotland, antonella@ling.ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Epstein et al.'s “full access to Universal Grammar” position is conceptually and empirically problematic. Its shortcomings are illustrated through a brief discussion of the following issues: (1) initial versus final states of grammatical knowledge in a second language, (2) knowledge of gradience of grainmaticality, (3) optionality and retention in non-native grammars, and (4) the empirical measurement of syntactic knowledge.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable