Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T12:01:33.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

partial reversal and the functions of lateralisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

richard john andrew
Affiliation:
department of biology and environmental sciences, school of life sciences, university of sussex, brighton, bn1 9qg, united kingdom bafe8@central.sussex.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

the use of lateralised cues by predators and fellows may not strongly affect lateralisation. conservatism of development is a possible source of consistency across vertebrates. individuals with partial reversal, affecting only one ability, or with varying degree of control of response by one hemisphere do exist. their incidence may depend on varying selection of behavioural phenotypes such as risk taking.

Information

Type
open peer commentary
Copyright
2005 cambridge university press