Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T21:17:52.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planning differences for chromaticity- and luminance-defined stimuli: A possible problem for Glover's planning–control model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Charles E. Wright*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-5100 http://www.faculty.uci.edu/scripts/UCIFacultyProfiles/DetailDept.CFM?ID=2451 http://www.cogsci.uci.edu/personnel/chubb/chubb.shtml
Charles Chubb*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-5100 http://www.faculty.uci.edu/scripts/UCIFacultyProfiles/DetailDept.CFM?ID=2451 http://www.cogsci.uci.edu/personnel/chubb/chubb.shtml
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We report data from an experiment using stimuli designed to differ in their availability for processing by the dorsal visual pathway, but which were equivalent in tasks mediated by the ventral pathway. When movements are made to these stimuli as targets, there are clear effects early in the movement. These effects appear at odds with the planning–control model of Glover.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004