Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:43:13.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The planning–control model and spatio-motor deficits following brain damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

H. Branch Coslett and
Laurel J. Buxbaum
H. Branch Coslett*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Laurel J. Buxbaum*
Affiliation:
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19141
*
hbc@mail.med.upenn.edu
lbuxbaum@einstein.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Glover's planning–control model accommodates a substantial number of findings from subjects who have motor deficits as a consequence of brain lesions. A number of consistently observed and robust findings are not, however, explained by Glover's theory; additionally, the claim that the IPL supports planning whereas the SPL supports control is not consistently supported in the literature.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004, pp. 31 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004