Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T23:25:51.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plans for action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Melvyn A. Goodale*
Affiliation:
CIHR Group on Action and Perception, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London ON N6A 5C2, Canada http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/goodale/
A. David Milner*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, United Kingdom http://psychology.dur.ac.uk/staff/details.asp?name=MILNER
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

It is our contention that the concept of planning in Glover's model is too broadly defined, encompassing both action/goal selection and the programming of the constituent movements required to acquire the goal. We argue that this monolithic view of planning is untenable on neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and behavioural grounds. The evidence demands instead that a distinction be made between action planning and the specification of the initial kinematic parameters, with the former depending on processing in the ventral stream and the latter on processing in the dorsal stream.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004