Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T00:53:29.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A population code with added grandmothers?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Malcolm P. Young ,
Stefano Panzeri  and
Robert Robertson
Malcolm P. Young
Affiliation:
Neural Systems Group, Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdomm.p.young@ncl.ac.ukwww.psychology.ncl.ac.uk/neural_systems_group.html
Stefano Panzeri
Affiliation:
Neural Systems Group, Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdomm.p.young@ncl.ac.ukwww.psychology.ncl.ac.uk/neural_systems_group.html
Robert Robertson
Affiliation:
Neural Systems Group, Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdomm.p.young@ncl.ac.ukwww.psychology.ncl.ac.uk/neural_systems_group.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Page's “localist” code, a population code with occasional, maximally firing elements, does not seem to us usefully or testably differentfrom sparse population coding. Some of the evidence adduced by Page for his proposal is not actually evidence for it, and coding by maximal firingis challenged by lower firing observed in neuronal responses to natural stimuli.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , August 2000 , pp. 495 - 496
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press