Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:46:09.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Priming and alignment: Mechanism or consequence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2004

Sarah Brown-Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, River Campus, Rochester, NY 14627 http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/sschmidt/ http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/mtan/mtan.html
Michael K. Tanenhaus*
Affiliation:
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, River Campus, Rochester, NY 14627 http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/sschmidt/ http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/mtan/mtan.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We agree with Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) proposal that dialogue is an important empirical and theoretical test bed for models of language processing. However, we offer two cautionary notes. First, the enterprise will require explicit computational models. Second, such models will need to incorporate both joint and separate speaker and hearer commitments in ways that go beyond priming and alignment.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004