Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T12:35:42.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real rules are conscious

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Axel Cleeremans*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Research Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, B-1050, Belgium http://srsc.ulb.ac.be/axcWWW/axc.html
Arnaud Destrebecqz*
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Research Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, B-1050, Belgium http://srsc.ulb.ac.be/axcWWW/axc.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In general, we agree with Pothos's claim that similarity and rule knowledge are best viewed as situated on the extreme points of a single representational continuum. However, we contend that a distinction can be made between “rule-like” and “rule-based” knowledge: Rule-based, symbolic knowledge is necessarily conscious when it is applied. Awareness thus provides a useful criterion for distinguishing between sensitivity to functional similarity and knowledge of symbolic rules.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005