Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T18:36:31.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relational learning re-examined

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

Chris Thornton
Affiliation:
Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, United Kingdom chris.thornton@cogs.Sussex.ac.uk
Andy Clark
Affiliation:
Philosophy/Neuroscience/Psychology Program, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130 andy@twinearth.wustl.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We argue that existing learning algorithms are often poorly equipped to solve problems involving a certain type of important and widespread regularity that we call “type-2 regularity.” The solution in these cases is to trade achieved representation against computational search. We investigate several ways in which such a trade-off may be pursued including simple incremental learning, modular connectionism, and the developmental hypothesis of “representational redescription.”

Information

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press