Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T13:16:07.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resolving repression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2006

Steven M. Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4235 http://people.tamu.edu/~stevesmith/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The feuding factions of the memory wars, that is, those concerned with the validity of recovered memories versus those concerned with false memories, are unified by Erdelyi's theory of repression. Evidence shows suppression, inhibition, and retrieval blocking can have profound yet reversible effects on a memory's accessibility, and deserve as prominent a role in the recovered memory debate as evidence of false memories. Erdelyi's theory shows that both inhibitory and elaborative processes cooperate to keep unwanted memories out of consciousness.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006