Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:55:31.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response intention and imagery processes: Locus, interaction, and contribution to motor learning

Review products

Commentary onM.Jeannerod (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. BBS 17:187–245

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Robert M. Kohl
Affiliation:
Division of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Ml 48202
Sebastiano A. Fisicaro
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Ml 48202.

Abstract

By way of commentary on Jeannerod (1994), we propose that (1) intention, response imagery, and actual response processes carry equal weight in inferring from one process to another, (2) memory networks control intention, which interacts with imagery-based processing to control response imagery, and (3) response imagery will demonstrate learning effects better when imagery reconstruction and elaboration are emphasized and neutral retention tests are utilized.

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable