Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:21:08.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensory feedback during eye movements reconsidered

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Wayne L. Shebilske
Wayne L. Shebilske
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va 22901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1978 , pp. 160 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bach-y-Rita, P.Extraocular proprioception and muscle function. Bibliotheca Ophthalmologica, 1972, 82:56–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Brindley, G. S., Goodwin, G. M., Kulikowski, J. J., and Leighton, D.Stability of vision with a paralysed eye. Journal of Physiology, 1976, 258:65–66P.Google Scholar
Ebenholtz, S. M.The possible role of eye-muscle potentiation in several forms of prism adaptation. Perception, 1974,3:477–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, K. C.Effects of fatiguing isometric exercise upon achilles tendon reflex and plantar flexion reaction time components in man. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 1975,34:69–79.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von.A Treatise on Physiological Optics (Vol. 3). (J. P. C. Southall, ed. and trans.). New York: Dover, 1963 (originally published, 1966).Google Scholar
Hughes, J. R.Post-tetanic potentiation. Physiological Reviews, 1958, 38:91–113.Google Scholar
Irvine, S. and Ludvigh, E.Is ocular proprioceptive sense concerned in vision? Archives of Ophthalmology, 1936,15:1037–1049.Google Scholar
Keller, E. L. and Robinson, D. A.Absence of a stretch reflex in extraocular muscle of the monkey. Journal ofNeurophysiology, 1971,34:908–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. M. Visual stability and voluntary eye movements. In Jung, R. (ed.), Central Processing of Visual Information. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
Matin, L.A possible hybrid mechanism for modification of visual direction associated with eye movements - the paralyzed-eye experiments reconsidered. Perception, 1976,5:233–239.Google Scholar
Eye movements and perceived visual direction. In Jameson, C. and Hurvich, L. M. (eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology (Vol. 7). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar
Paap, K. R. Perceptual Consequences of Post-Tetanic-Potentiation: an Alternative Explanation for Adaptation to Wedge Prisms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1975.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. A.The mechanics of human saccadic eye movements. Journal of Physiology, 1964,174:245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shebilske, W. L.Extraretinal information in corrective saccades and inflow vs. outflow theories of visual direction constancy. Vision Research, 1976,16:621–628.Google Scholar
Visuomotor coordination in visual direction and position constancies. In Epstein, W. (ed.), Stability and Constancy in Visual Perception: Mechanisms and Processes. New York: Wiley, 1977a.Google Scholar
Directional scanning biases and shifts of apparent visual direction. Vision Research, 1977b, 17:495–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shebilske, W. L. and Fogelgren, L. A.Eye position aftereffects of backward head tilt manifested by illusory visual direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 1977,21:77–82.Google Scholar
Siebeck, R.Wahrnehmungsstōrung und Storungswahrnehmung bei Augenmuskellähmungen. Albrecht Graefes Arch. Opththal., 1954, 155:26–34.Google Scholar
Skavenski, A. A.Extraretinal correction and memory for target position. Vision Research, 1971,11:743–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inflow as a source of extraretinal eye position information. Vision Research, 1972,12:221–229.Google Scholar
Skavenski, A. A., Haddad, G. and Steinman, R. M.The extraretinal signal for the visual perception of direction. Perception and Psychophysics, 1972,11:287–290.Google Scholar
Skavenski, A. A. and Steinman, R. M.Control of eye position in the dark. Vision Research, 1970,10:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, L. The control system for versional eye movements. In Bach-YRita, P., Collins, C. C., and Hyde, J. E. (eds.), The Control of Eye Movements. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. K., Emerson, R. C, Gerstein, T. K., Neufeld, G. R., Nichols, C. W., and Rosenquist, A. C.Paralysis of the awake human: visual perceptions. Vision Research, 1976,16:93–98.Google Scholar
Whitteridge, D.The effect of stimulation of intrafusal muscle fibers on sensitivity to stretch of extraocular muscle spindles. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology, 1959,44:385–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed