Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:03:20.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensory templates: Mechanism or metaphor?

Review products

Commentary onJohnstonTimothy D. (1988) Developmental explanation and the ontogeny of birdsong: Nature/nurture redux. BBS 11: 617–663.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Johan Bolhuis and
Mark Johnson
Johan Bolhuis
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
Mark Johnson
Affiliation:
MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London WC1H OAH, England
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 1991, pp. 349 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bolhuis, J. J., Johnson, M. H. & Horn, G. (1985) Effects of early experience on the development of filial preferences in the domestic chick. Developmental Psychobiology 18:299–308. [JB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, J. J., Johnson, M. H. & Horn, G. (1989) Interacting mechanisms during the formation of filial preferences: The development of a predisposition does not prevent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 15:376–8. [JB]Google Scholar
Güttinger, H.-R. (1988) Template theory is heuristic in disentangling organism–environment interactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11(4):633. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, G. (1985) Memory, imprinting, and the brain. Clarendon Press. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. H. & Horn, G. (1988) Development of filial preferences in darkreared chicks. Animal Behaviour 36:675–83. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. H., Bolhuis, J. J. & Horn, G. (1985) Interaction between acquired preferences and developing predispositions during imprinting. Animal Behaviour 33:1000–06. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. D. (1987) The persistence of dichotomies in the study of behavioral development. Developmental Review 7:149–82. [rTDJ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. D. (1988) Developmental explanation and the ontogeny of birdsong: Nature/nurture redux. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11(4):617–63. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrman, D. S. (1953) A critique of Konrad Lorenz's theory of instinctive behavior. Quarterly Review of Biology 28:337–63. [rTDJ]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenz, K. Z. (1965) Evolution and modification of behavior. Chicago University Press [rTDJ]Google Scholar
Marler, P. (1976) Sensory templates in species specific behavior. In: Simpler networks and behavior, ed. Fentress, J. C.. Sinauer. [JB]Google Scholar
Marler, P. (1984) Song learning: Innate species differences in the learning process. In: The biology of learning, ed. Marler, P. & Terrace, H. S.. Springer Verlag. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneirla, T. C. (1956) Interrelationships of the “innate” and the “acquired” in instinctive behavior. In: L'Instinct dans le comportement des animaux et de I'homme, ed. Grassé, P. P.. Masson. [rTDJ]Google Scholar
Staddon, J. E. R. (1983) Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge University Press. [JB]Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. M. (1982) Homology and causes. Journal of Morphology 173:305–12. [LMV]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed