Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:39:25.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Similarity in logical reasoning and decision-making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Horacio Arló-Costa*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 http://www.phil.cmu.edu/faculty/arlocosta/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Normative accounts in terms of similarity can be deployed in order to provide semantics for systems of context-free default rules and other sophisticated conditionals. In contrast, procedural accounts of decision in terms of similarity (Rubinstein 1997) are hard to reconcile with the normative rules of rationality used in decision-making, even when suitably weakened.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005