Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T04:53:47.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulations, simulators, amodality, and abstract terms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 1999

Robert W. Mitchell  and
Catherine A. Clement
Robert W. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 psymitch@acs.eku.edu psyclement@acs.eku.edu
Catherine A. Clement
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475 psymitch@acs.eku.edu psyclement@acs.eku.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Barsalou's interesting model might benefit from defining simulation and clarifying the implications of prior critiques for simulations (and not just for perceptual symbols). Contrary to claims, simulators (or frames) appear, in the limit, to be amodal. In addition, the account of abstract terms seems extremely limited.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , August 1999 , pp. 628 - 629
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press