Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T01:43:33.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Speaking of beliefs: Reporting or constituting mental entities?

Review products

Commentary onAlisonCopnik (1993) How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. BBS 16:1–14.

Commentary onAlvin I.Goldman (1993) The psychology of folk psychology. BBS 16:15–28.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Werner Greve
Affiliation:
Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachen e. v., Lützerodestrasse 9, 3061 Hannover, Germany. eberhard.mecklenburg@kfn-verein.uni-hannover.d400.de
Axel Buchner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Trier, P.O. Box 3825, D-54286 Trier, Germany. buchner@cogpsy.uni-trier.de

Abstract

Gopnik's argument that instead of having privileged access we must develop a theory about our minds is criticized. First, the theory metaphor is too vague, and scientific concepts of what a theory is are left unexploited. Second, the studies Gopnik interprets as showing that children must develop a theory about their mental states are also compatible with the view that children have to develop these states.

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable