Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:44:23.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specificity in a global array is only one possibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2005

Eric L. Amazeen  and
Guy C. Van Orden
Eric L. Amazeen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
Guy C. Van Orden
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287
*
Eric.Amazeen@asu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy (S&B) fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 887 - 888
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Footnotes

Commentary on T. A. Stoffregen & B. G. Bardy (2001). On specification and the senses. BBS 24(2):195–261.