Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T12:28:26.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stipulating versus discovering representations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

David C. Plaut
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Computer Science and the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Mellon Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2683 plaut@cmu.edujlm@cnbc.cmu.eduwww.cnbc.cmu.edu/~plautwww.cnbc.cmu.edu/people/mcclelland.html
James L. McClelland
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Computer Science and the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Mellon Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2683 plaut@cmu.edujlm@cnbc.cmu.eduwww.cnbc.cmu.edu/~plautwww.cnbc.cmu.edu/people/mcclelland.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Page's proposal to stipulate representations in which individual units correspond to meaningful entities is too unconstrained to support effective theorizing. An approach combining general computational principles with domain-specific assumptions, in which learning is used to discover representations that are effective in solving tasks, provides more insight into why cognitive and neural systems are organized the way they are.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
2000 Cambridge University Press