Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:37:36.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural descriptions in HIT –a problematic commitment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2001

Markus Graf
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich D-80802, Germany grafm@psy.uni-muenchen.de wxs@psy.uni-muenchen.de www.paed.uni-muenchen.de/mip/PSYCH/wxs/wwwdocs/index.html
Werner X. Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich D-80802, Germany grafm@psy.uni-muenchen.de wxs@psy.uni-muenchen.de www.paed.uni-muenchen.de/mip/PSYCH/wxs/wwwdocs/index.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Humphreys and Forde conceptualize object representations as structural descriptions, without discussing the implications of structural description models. We argue that structural description models entail two major assumptions – a part-structure assumption and an invariance assumption. The invariance assumption is highly problematic because it contradicts a large body of findings which indicate that recognition performance depends on orientation and size. We will delineate relevant findings and outline an alternative conception.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press