Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T02:06:22.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teleological perception without a biological perceiver?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2005

Théophile Ohlmann ,
Bernard Amblard  and
Brice Isableu
Théophile Ohlmann*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychologie et de Neurocognition, UMR CNRS 5105, 38040 Grenoble CEDEX 9, France
Bernard Amblard*
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Développement et Pathologie du Mouvement, 13402 Marseille CEDEX 20, France
Brice Isableu*
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Sciences du Sport, UPRES 1609, Division STAPS, Université Paris Sud-XI, 91 405 Orsay CEDEX, Batiment 335, France
*
theophile.ohlmann@upmf-grenoble.fr
amblard@lnf.cnrs-mrs.fr
Brice.Isableu@staps.u-psud.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Strong between- and within-animal differences during spatial activities lead us to claim that a given animal is directly sensitive to a given substructure of the global array. This vicarious subset is not cut out by the senses but by redundancies emerging from physical properties. We argue that the subset is not a single ambient array, or a combination of single ambient arrays, but a complex holistic part of the global array.

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 888 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Footnotes

Commentary on T. A. Stoffregen & B. G. Bardy (2001). On specification and the senses. BBS 24(2):195–261.