Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T00:35:45.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The tension between “combinatorial”and “class-default” regularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1999

Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand a.c-mcc@ling.canterbury.ac.nz www.ling.canterbury.ac.nz/adc-m.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Clahsen shows that “combinatorial” inflection is processed differently from “irregular” inflection. However, combinatorially regular affixes need not coincide with “class-default” affixes, that is, affixes shared by more than one inflection class and all of whose rivals are peculiar to one class. This creates a tension that may help to explain the persistence of inflection class systems.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press