Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:20:41.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tenure and academic freedom: Prospects and constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2007

Stephen J. Ceci*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 http://www.human.cornell.edu/che/Features/bio.cfm?netid=sjc9
Wendy M. Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 http://www.human.cornell.edu/che/Features/bio.cfm?netid=sjc9
Katrin Mueller-Johnson*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB3 9DT, United Kingdom http://www.human.cornell.edu/che/Features/bio.cfm?netid=wmw5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In our target article, we took the position that tenure conveys many important benefits but that its original justificationfostering academic freedomis not one of them. Here we respond to various criticisms of our study as well as to proposals to remedy the current state of affairs. Undoubtedly, more research is needed to confirm and extend our findings, but the most reasonable conclusion remains the one we offeredthat the original rationale for tenure is poorly served by the current system as practiced at top-ranked colleges and universities.

Information

Type
Authors’ Response
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007