Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T20:09:53.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two kinds of representational functionalism: Defusing the combinatorial explosion

Review products

Commentary onAlisonCopnik (1993) How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. BBS 16:1–14.

Commentary onAlvin I.Goldman (1993) The psychology of folk psychology. BBS 16:15–28.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Joel Pust
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721jpust@ccit.arizona.edu

Abstract

Alvin Goldman (1993) presents three arguments against the psychological plausibility of representational functionalism (RF) as a theory of how subjects self-ascribe mental predicates. Goldman appears to construe RF as an account of attitude type self-ascription. His “combinatorial explosion” argument, however, proves devastating only to an implausible construal of RF as an account of attitude content self-ascription.

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable