Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T08:36:33.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What is the point? Concepts, description, and rigid designation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Bradley Franks
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, London School of Economics, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom B.franks@lse.ac.uk
Nick Braisby
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, London Guildhall University, London E1 7NT, United Kingdom braisby@lgu.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Millikan's nondescriptionist approach applies an account of meaning to concepts in terms of designation. The essentialism that provides the principal grounds for rigid designation, however, receives no empirical support from concepts. Whatever the grounding, this view not only faces the problems of rigid designation in theories of meaning, it also calls for a role for pragmatics more consonant with descriptionist theories of concepts.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press