Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T12:43:02.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Which behavioral consequences matter? The importance of frame of reference in explaining addiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Gene M. Heyman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. gmh@wjh12.harvard.edu

Abstract

The target article emphasizes the relationship between a matching law-based theory of addiction and the disease model of addiction. In contrast, this response emphasizes the relationship between the matching law theory and other behavioral approaches to addiction. The basic difference, I argue, is that the matching law specifies that choice is governed by local reinforcement rates. In contrast, economics says that overall reinforcement rate controls choice, and for other approaches there are other measures or no clear prediction at all. The response also differs from the target article in that there is more emphasis on the finding that stimulus conditions determine whether choice is under local or overall reinforcement rate control.

Information

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable