Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:47:49.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Which is to blame: Instrumental rationality, or common knowledge?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2003

Matt Jones*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109 http://umich.edu/~mattj
Jun Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109 http://umich.edu/~mattj
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Normative analysis in game-theoretic situations requires assumptions regarding players' expectations about their opponents. Although the assumptions entailed by the principle of common knowledge are often violated, available empirical evidence – including focal point selection and violations of backward induction – may still be explained by instrumentally rational agents operating under certain mental models of their opponents.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003