Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T09:35:47.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why bother about opponency? Our theoretical ideas on elementary colour coding have changed our language of experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2019

Rainer J. Mausfeld
Affiliation:
Institute for Psychology, University of Kiel, D-24098 Kiel, Germanymausfeld@psychologie.uni-kiel.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

There is no natural and pretheoretical classification of colour appearances into hue, saturation, brightness, unique hues, and so on. Rather, our theoretical insights into the coding of colour have reciprocally shaped the way we talk about colour appearances. Opponency is only one of many fundamental aspects of colour coding, and we are hardly justified in ascribing some theoretical prominance to it.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
1997 Cambridge University Press