Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T05:31:16.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of Behaviour Therapy in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Syd H. Lovibond
Syd H. Lovibond*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
*
University of New South Wales, School of Psychology, P.O. Box 1, Kensington NSW 2033, Australia
Get access

Abstract

In his address to the Annual Conference of the Australian Behaviour Modification Association in 1986, Dr. Robin Winkler chose the topic “The social history of behaviour modification in Australia” (Winkler & Krasner, 1987). Dr. Winkler was concerned to recognise the contributions of a number of individuals who were prominent in the new movement in the 50s, 60s and 70s. My aim is rather different. I want to try to capture what the early workers were trying to achieve, what they saw as the problems, and how they viewed the early developments. I will then look at more recent developments in Australian behaviour therapy, and try to characterise its current status. Finally, I'll discuss what seem to me the major current problems, and suggest some possible solutions. Where I feel able to do so, and it seems to me appropriate, I'll make some comparisons with the situation in the USA. Many of the more general points, of course, will be relevant to behaviour therapy in any country.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 3 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed. rev). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Peer review in Australia. Glebe, NSW: Australian Medical Association and Australian Council on Hospital Standards Peer Review Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Andrews, G. (1991). The evaluation of psychotherapy. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 4, 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, A. (1992). Threats to the future of professional psychology. Bulletin of the Australian Psychological Society, 14, 7–8.Google Scholar
Eifert, G.H., & Craill, L. (1989). The relationship between affect, behaviour, and cognition in behavioural and cognitive treatments of depression and phobic anxiety. Behaviour Change, 6, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. (1960). Behaviour therapy and the neuroses. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Hebb, D.O. (1949). The organisation of behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hull, C.L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Oei, T.P.S., Duckham, S., & Free, M. (1989). Does cognitive behaviour therapy support cognitive models of depression? Behaviour Change, 6, 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. (Anrep, G.V., Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sechrest, L. (1992). The past future of clinical psychology: A reflection on Woodworth (1937). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 18–23.Google Scholar
Slattery, J.P. (1990). Report of the Royal Commission into deep sleep therapy. Vol. 13, Term 2. Chap 21. Sydney: NSW Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wilson, P.H. (1989). Cognitive-behaviour therapy for depression: Empirical findings and methodological issues in evaluation of outcome. Behaviour Change, 6, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, R.C., & Krasner, L. (1987). A social history of behaviour modification in Australia. Behaviour Change, 4, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., & Spitzer, R.L. (1989). Melancholia: From DSM-III to DSM-III-R. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 20–28.Google Scholar