Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T18:12:35.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discriminant Validity of a Measurement System for Assessing Social Competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Alan Ralph
Alan Ralph*
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
*
Psychology Program, Murdoch University, Murdoch WA 6150
Get access

Abstract

A system of assessing social competence based on empirical analysis of a sample of non-referred subjects was applied to a group of subjects referred for social skills training. Scores obtained with the system discriminated between the referred and non-referred subjects. Data also supported the use of the system to evaluate changes which occurred during the course of the training program. However, this finding was not uniform across all subjects. Discussion centres on the variables which might account for this lack of uniformity and on further applications for the system as a research and therapy tool.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1990, pp. 76 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Amidon, E.J., & Hough, J.B., J.B., (1967) (Eds.). Interaction analysis: Theory research and application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Amidon, E.J., & Hunter, E. (1967). Verbal interaction in the classroom: The Verbal Interaction Category System. In Amidon, E.J. & Hough, J.B. (Eds.). Interaction analysis: Theory research and application, (pp. 141–149). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequence analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bramston, P., & Spence, S. (1985). Behavioural versus cognitive social skills training with intellectually handicapped adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 239–246.Google Scholar
Conger, J.C., & Farrell, A.D. (1981). Behavioural components of heterosocial skills. Behaviour Therapy, 12, 41–55.Google Scholar
Eisler, R.M., Hersen, M., & Miller, P.M. (1974). Shaping components of assertive behaviour with instructions and feedback. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 1344–1347.Google Scholar
Flanders, N.A. (1967). Interaction models of critical teaching behaviours. In. Amidon, E.J. & Hough, J.B. (Eds.). Interaction analysis: Theory, research, and application, (pp.360–374). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Friedlander, M.L. (1984). Psychotherapy talk as social control. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 21, 335–341.Google Scholar
Friedlander, M.L., & Phillips, S.D. (1984). Stochastic process analysis of interactive discourse in early counselling interviews. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollendick, T.H. (1982). The Social Competency Project. Blacksburg, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Peterson, L., & Gannoni, A.F. (1988). Manual for social skills training in young people with parent and teacher programmes. Beverley, South Australia: Kitchener Press.Google Scholar
Ralph, A. (1988) Social skills training: How can we tell if it works? Australian Psychologist, 23, 305–314.Google Scholar
Ralph, A., & Birnbrauer, J.S. (1988). The search for valid measures of social competence: The variability and consistency of component behaviour. Behaviour Change, 5, 108–116.Google Scholar
Ralph, A., & Birnbrauer, J.S. (1989). Differences in the demands of conversations and job interviews. The Verbal Interaction Analysis System. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Spence, S. (1980). Social skills training with children and adolescents: A counsellors manual. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar