Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:23:37.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lectures, Prompts and Contracts to Promote Parental Safety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Anne M. Seal and
Hal Swerissen
Anne M. Seal*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Hal Swerissen
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
*
Department of Behavioural Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia
Get access

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of lectures, prompts, and contracts in promoting maternal safety behaviours. The term maternal safety behaviours refers to any actions that mothers perform which will help prevent injuries to children, such as supervising toddlers near a swimming pool or storing poisons so that they are out of reach. Fifty-six mothers participated in a safety education program in one of four groups: (a) waiting-list control, (b) standard safety lecture, (c) lecture plus prompts (check-list), and (d) lecture plus prompts and contract. The results indicated that while there were no significant differences between groups in mothers' self-reported behaviours 6 to 8 weeks after the intervention, a consistent trend in the predicted direction was found. The results are discussed in relation to the need to develop more effective educational strategies based on behavioural techniques to promote parental safety within a minimal intervention framework.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1993, pp. 103 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1990). Causes of death. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dershewitz, R.A., & Williamson, J.W. (1977). Prevention of childhood household injuries: A controlled clinical trial. American Journal of Public Health, 67(12), 1148–1153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, B., Sein, C., & McCarthy, P.L. (1987). Safety education in a pediatric primary care setting. Pediatrics, 79(5), 818–824.Google Scholar
Minchom, P.E., Sibert, J.R., Newcombe, R.G., & Bowley, M.A. (1984). Does health education prevent childhood accidents? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 60, 260–262.Google Scholar
Nazarian, L.F., Mechaber, J., Charney, E., & Coulter, M.P. (1974). Effect of a mailed appointment reminder on appointment keeping. Pediatrics, 53(3), 349–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, P.J. (1982). Poisoning prevention — results of a public media campaign. Australian Paedialric Journal, 18, 250–252.Google Scholar
Ryder, D. (1988). Minimal intervention: A little quality for a lot of quantity? Behaviour Change, 5(3), 100–107.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.L., & Levy, R.L.(1981). Behavioral assignments and treatment compliance. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar