Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T00:23:55.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Youth Version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: A Psychometric Validation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Kay Wilson,
Eleonora Gullone and
Simon Moss
Kay Wilson
Affiliation:
Monash University
Eleonora Gullone*
Affiliation:
Monash University
Simon Moss
Affiliation:
Monash University
*
Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. E-mail: E.Gullone@sci.monash.edu.au
Get access

Extract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the revised Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (PANAS-C; Joiner, Catanzaro & Laurent, 1996) in 228 nonclinical children and adolescents aged between 8 and 15 years. The results revealed that the PANAS-C possesses high internal consistency and encouraging convergent validity, as demonstrated by correlations with the theoretically related constructs of Neuroticism and Extraversion. Construct validity was supported through confirmatory factor analysis, which revealed a two dimensional structure comprising Negative and Positive Affect. Divergent validity was confirmed by the nonsignificant correlation between positive and negative affect. Thus, the PANAS-C was demonstrated to have good reliability and validity, subject to minor changes in item content.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 1998, pp. 187 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos users' guide version 3.6. Chicago: Small Waters.Google Scholar
Avia, M.D. (1997). Personality and positive emotions. European Journal of Personality, 11(1), 33–56.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, D.S., & Hansen, J.S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect and social interaction' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(A), 796–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, C.P., & Gullone, E. (1997). Negative affectivity: Adolescent self-reports. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, T. (1991). Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales? Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K.W., & Moskowitz, D.S. (1997). Does unhappiness make you sick? The role of affect and Neuroticism in the experience of common physical symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 907–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K.A. & Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Clark, L.A., & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortina, L. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1980). Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(A), 668–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E. (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., & Emmons, R.A. (1985). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038.Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). The relationship in experience between two types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionaire (Junior and Adult). New York: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Greene, A.L., (1990). Patterns of affectivity in the transition to adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 340–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izard, C.E., Libero, D.Z., Putnam, P., & Haynes, O.M. (1993). Stability of emotion experiences and their relations to traits of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 847–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joiner, T.E., Catanzaro, S.J., & Laurent, J. (1996). Tripartite structure of positive and negative affect, depression and anxiety in child and adolescent psychiatric in-patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(3), 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, M. (1991). Rating scales to assess depression in school-aged children. Acta Paedopsychiatrica, 46, 305–315.Google Scholar
Meyer, G.J., & Shack, J.R. (1989). Structural convergence of mood and personality: Evidence for old and new directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, L., & Mavissakalian, M. (1983). Temporal stability of self-report measures in agoraphobia research. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 695–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C.R., & Richmond, B.O. (1985). Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Sun, E., Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1996). Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1091–1102.Google Scholar
Watson, D. (1988). The vicissitudes of mood measurement: Effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 128–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relations to the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Teilegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J.A., Strauss, M.E., & McCormick, R.A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model II: Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., & Walker, , (1996). The long-term stability and predictive validity of trait measures of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3) 567–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed