Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T16:27:56.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethics, Procedures and Contingency Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

John Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, Whitchurch Hospital, Cardiff

Extract

The recognition that psychological theories, and methods of behaviour change derived from them, are value laden seems to be relatively recent. Vine (1977) has commented on the fact that ethical questions receive the least attention of any topic area in psychology examination questions. He believes that psychologists “are evidently impervious to all those many critics of psychology who object to our irresponsible methodologies, to our philosophical ignorance in recognising that data are theory-laden, and to our frequent and unrecognised prostitution of our discipline” (Vine, 1977, p.377). In view of attempts at restriction of behaviour modification practice already made in the United States and in Britain, it becomes a professional necessity, not a mere armchair luxury, to assess the ethical status of behaviour modification procedures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.