Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:46:16.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Differences in Response to Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Fraser N. Watts
Fraser N. Watts
Affiliation:
Psychology Dept., Institute of Psychiatry, University of London.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One aspect of behaviour therapy research that has been surprisingly slow to develop is the prediction of outcome from individual differences. In most other ways (the formulation of treatment methods precisely enough for them to be replicable, the controlled evaluation of treatment efficacy, the investigation of procedural variations which are of theoretical importance etc.) behaviour therapy research is relatively advanced. But curiously, the prediction outcome is much less well investigated than it is in some other treatment fields such as rehabilitation, which are in other ways at a lower level of scientific development than behaviour therapy.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 1975, pp. 7 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Birney, R.C., Burdick, H.B. and Teevan, R.C. (1969) Fear of Failure. New York: Van Mostrand.Google Scholar
Costello, C.G. (1966) Psychology for Psychiatrists. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1957) The two disciplines of scientific psychology. Amer.Psychol., 12, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M.P. and MacCulloch, M.J. (1971) Homosexual behaviour: therapy and assessment. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, A.P. (1973) Structured learning therapy: toward a psychotherapy for the poor. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, P. (1972) A study of attitudes in industrial rehabilitation. Occupational Psychology, 46, 87–97.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, H. (1967) The anatomy of achievement motivation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lader, M.H., Gelder, M.G. and Marks, I.M. (1967) Palmar conductance measures as predictors of response to desensitization. J. Psychosom. Res., 11, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, P. (1973) On the relation between test theory and psychology. In: Kline, P. (Ed.) New approaches in psychological measurement. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Luborsky, L., Chandler, M., Averbach, A.H., Cohen, J. and Bachrach, H.M. (1971) Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: A review of quantitative research. Psychological Bull., 75, 145–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, I., Boulgouris, J. and Marset, P. (1971) Flooding versus desensitization in the treatment of phobic patients. Brit. J. Psychiat., 119, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, I., Marks, I.M. and Gelder, M. (1969) Conditioned eyelid responses in phobic patients. Behav. Res. Ther., 7, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, L. (1968) Human adaptation and its failures. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rachman, S. and Teasdale, J. (1969) Aversion therapy and behaviour disorders. London; Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Raw, M. (1974) Motivation in smoking withdrawal. Unpublished dissertation: University of London.Google Scholar
Stanley, J.C. (1971) Ch. 13: Reliability. In: Thorndike, R.L. (Ed.) Educational Measurement, 2nd Ed.Washington: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Weiner, B., Freize, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S. and Rosenbaum, R.M. (1971) Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In: Jones, E.E., Kanouse, D., Kelley, H.H., Nisbett, R.E., Valins, S. and Weiner, B. (Eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.