Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:56:17.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences in Mortality Rates Between Services Users of Different Racial/ethnic Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2026

Filipa M.A.A. Teixeira
Affiliation:
South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United KingdomGuy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomKings College London, London, United Kingdom
Motaz Sonbol
Affiliation:
South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Mohamed Anis-Alavi
Affiliation:
South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Aims:

The purpose of this thematic review was to analyse and explore the underlying factors contributing to differences in mortality rates among service users from different racial and ethnic groups within South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust (SWLStG), specifically in ethnic minority groups. By systematically examining deaths occurring under the care of the Trust, the review aimed to identify recurring themes, potentially to inform recommendations to reduce inequalities and improve patient safety.

Methods:

Information was collected on all reported deaths between February 2025 and April 2025 of service users under the care of the Trust’s mental health services. A total of 145 deaths were reported and included in the review. Incident reports were extracted from Ulysses. Demographic and clinical information was checked and verified using RIO, including recorded ethnicity, progress notes, and relevant clinical and risk assessment documentation.

Results:

Of the 145 deaths reviewed, most occurred among White British (66%) or “other white” service users (10%), and of confirmed or suspected suicides, 73% were from white British or “other white” service users. 6.21% of service users’ ethnicity was unknown. Most deaths (84%) were due to natural causes, often at relatively older ages and in the context of significant physical health comorbidity. A proportion of deaths occurred following loss of contact with services, due to patient disengagement or during transition between mental health teams. There was limited information available for some deaths, making cause and circumstance unclear. Variation in service engagement and clinical documentation was observed across teams. Most service users had a documented mental disorder, most commonly cognitive decline or dementia (27%) and mixed anxiety and depression (25%). Among patients who died by possible suicide, 31.8% had a history of drug or alcohol dependence. No clear ethnicity-specific themes were identified, with interpretation limited by the small sample size.

Conclusion:

This review highlights that most deaths among mental health service users were due to natural causes and were associated with physical health comorbidities. Recurrent themes included disengagement from services, communication gaps during care transitions, and variable documentation. Although ethnic minorities were a small proportion of the sample, evidence of lower access of these populations to mental health services remains relevant. Improving consistency of ethnicity recording, clinical documentation, engagement with service users, as well as strengthening communication between services, is indicated.

Information

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.