Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-cbgtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:56:23.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Isolation to Integration: Implementing a Reliable Weekend Handover System in Acute Psychiatric Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2026

Matthew Nelson
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
Helen Popov
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
Rebecca Gilmore
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
Emily Lowe
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
Abeku Mensah
Affiliation:
Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Aims:

Weekend medical handover across Central Norfolk acute psychiatric services has historically been inconsistent and poorly structured, contributing to delayed reviews, duplicated tasks, reduced situational awareness, and resident doctor isolation. This Quality Improvement Project aimed to introduce a standardised weekend handover system to improve clinical safety, timeliness of care, and on-call doctor experience. Objectives included establishing a reliable weekend handover meeting, improving information completeness,facilitating early identification of unwell patients, and reducing inappropriate tasks passed to out-of-hours teams.

Methods:

Using PDSA cycles, we implemented: (1) a 09:00 Saturday and Sunday multi-site Teams handover for Tier 1 and Tier 2 doctors; (2) pre-arranged invites and reminders; (3) a structured digital handover log covering admissions, unwell patients, investigations, and tasks; and (4) a centralised Teams channel for document access. Surveys at two timepoints assessed communication, clarity, task appropriateness, and perceived support. Clinical outcomes from 63 weekend admissions (March–May 2025) were compared pre-intervention and post-intervention, including time to first medical review, senior review, and medication administration.

Results:

Baseline survey responses (n=16) showed moderate satisfaction (mean ≈3), with good supervision (3.6) but poor perceived handover structure (2.3). Willingness to attend weekend handover was 56%. Qualitative feedback reported improved communication, reduced isolation, and better planning for the day. Post-intervention data demonstrated improvements in time to first medical review (10.7%), physical-health medication (10.2%), and psychotropic administration (33.0%). Time to senior face-to-face review increased (97.2%). The reasons for this deterioration are unclear and likely multifactorial. One interpretation is that collective discussion of all new admissions during morning handover increased Tier 1 doctors’ sense of support, reducing perceived need for immediate escalation. Indirectly, this may reflect improved resident doctor confidence and adequacy of remote senior input, though further exploration is required. Barriers included technological unfamiliarity, variable engagement, and inappropriate task shifting from weekday teams.

Conclusion:

A structured weekend handover system is both feasible and beneficial for improving communication, early clinical planning, and aspects of patient care. Importantly, qualitative feedback highlighted a strong positive impact on resident doctors’ wellbeing, with many reporting reduced isolation, improved support, and greater confidence in managing weekend workloads. Next steps include automated invites, refining the digital handover log, and establishing a routine senior weekend review pathway, with potential for wider trust adoption.

Information

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.