Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T21:07:23.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Safe Medication Prescribing in Halton Memory Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Divya Jain
Affiliation:
Merseycare NHS Trust, Halton, United Kingdom
Archisha Marya*
Affiliation:
Liverpool University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Aims

  • • To improve safe medication prescribing by achieving a 25% improvement in the number of cases reported in the practice within six months.

  • • To reduce human factors contributing to medication errors to improve patient safety and quality of care.

Methods

  • • Retrospective data collection was done for Halton and Widnes patients from March 2022 to April 2023;

  • • Retrospective data collection for Re-audit was done for a period between June 2023 to January 2024 to complete the audit cycle;

  • • Liaised with medicine management team for local practices/policies;

  • • Reviewed and verified Trust standardised local policies on medicine management;

  • • Reviewed incident data and checked processes in other teams;

  • • The findings were presented at the Medicine Management meeting in May 2023;

  • • Training on safe prescribing was delivered to the Memory team in June 2023.

Results

  • • During the first data collection period, 14 incident forms were reported.

  • • During the second data collection period, 1 incident form was reported which was an administrative error.

  • • Prescribing errors for the first cycle accounted for 28.6%, administrative errors for 35.7%, dispensing errors for 21.4%, and other errors for 14.3%.

  • • Specific error types included prescribing the wrong dose/medication, medication not prescribed, medication unavailable and double prescribing.

  • • No incidents of restraint, seclusion, rapid tranquillisation, ambulance calls, or RIDDOR were reported.

Conclusion

  • • Administrative errors accounted for the majority of the total reported incidents (35.7%).

  • • Recommendations include safe clinical practice of prescribing medication (MDT lead to update medication card and inform GP promptly).

  • • Other recommendations were medication card updates, aligning clinical systems, avoiding email requests and introducing Community EPMA (Trust objective to introduce EPMA to community teams in 2024/25) and to standardise procedures.

  • • An improvement of 92.9% in the incident reporting was found in the re-audit following a training session to the team with improved practice of no email requests or chains.

  • • The audit identified communication difficulties within memory services, primary care and care home.

  • • It also highlighted challenges related to new staff, post-MDT meetings medication card updates, prescriber preferences, geographical disparities, and doctors’ availability.

Information

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.