Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:12:20.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effective Decision Making in a Life Company

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

M. Iqbal
M. Iqbal
Affiliation:
Deloitte MCS Ltd, Horizon House, 28 Upper High Street, Epsom KT17 4RS, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)1372-824094; E-mail: iiqbal@deloitte.co.uk and IckiIqbal@yahoo.co.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In the recent past life companies have made many decisions which they have had cause to deeply regret. This paper looks at the range of decision making theories available. It then examines recent examples of decisions that had unfavourable consequences and explores why they were taken, and goes on to describe a systematic approach to decision making which can help management assess more objectively the difficult choices confronting them today. The approach does not require espousal of any specific decision theory or method of value measurement. The focus is on the decision making process and the organisation's capacity to handle change. The paper identifies the three requirements for effective decision making.

Keywords

Decision MakingAttitude to RiskAccounting StandardsMeasures for SuccessManagement by InequalitiesResource Management

Information

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , 01 April 2005, pp. 133 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2005

References

Arrow, K.J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Helsinki Yrjo Hahnsson Foundation.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Markham Publishing.Google Scholar
Bell, D.E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operational Research, 30, 961–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D.E. (1983). Risk premiums for decisions regret. Management Science, 29(10), 1158–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk (translated from Latin) in Econometrica, 22, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, P.L. (1996). Against the gods, the remarkable story of risk. John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar
Brealey, R.A. & Myers, S.C. (1988). Principles of corporate finance. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
De Bondt, W. & Thaler, R.H. (1985). Does the stockmarket overreact? Journal of Finance, XL(3), 793–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froggatt, H.W. & Iqbal, M. (2002). Smashing with profits business. Paper presented to the Staple Inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Goford, J. (1985). The control cycle: financial control of a life assurance company. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries Students' Society, 28, 99–114.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B. (1982). Managerial incentive problems - a dynamic perspective. Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, M. (1997). Single currency, Bacon & Woodrow seminar slides.Google Scholar
Iqbal, M. (1998). EMU and the single currency. Life Convention talk.Google Scholar
Jenson, M. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1921). A treatise on probability, Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1934). The general theory of employment, interest and money (paperback edition) (1997). Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Lewin, C.G., Carne, S.A., De Rivaz, N.F.C., Hall, R.E.G., McKelvey, K.J. & Wilkie, A.D. (1995). Capital projects. British Actuarial Journal, 1, 155–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, W. (2002). Managing risk: practical lessons from recent ‘failures’ of EU insurers. FSA occasional paper 20.Google Scholar
Morris, S. (2001). Political correctness. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 231–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P.G. (1979). Are objectivism and subjectivism compatible concepts? Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 107, 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, Lord (2004). Report of the Equitable Life Enquiry.Google Scholar
Scharfstein, D. & Stein, J. (1990). Herd behaviour and investment. American Economic Review, 80, 465–479.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1958). Organisation.Google Scholar
Simons, R. (1999). How risky is your company? Harvard Business Review, 85–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Tripp, M.H., Bradley, H.L., Devitt, R., Orros, G.C., Overton, G.L., Pryor, L.M. & Shaw, R.A. (2004). Quantifying operational risk in general insurance companies. British Actuarial Journal (to appear).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992). Choice values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Koehler, D.J. (1994). Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review 101(4), 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar