Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T09:27:36.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of area-wide population structure between Orius strigicollis and Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2026

Lan Kong*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecological Information, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Norihide Hinomoto
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ecological Information, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Lan Kong; Email: kong.lan.s46@kyoto-u.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Content of image described in text.

This study investigated the population structure of predatory bugs belonging to the genus Orius (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), with a specific focus on O. strigicollis and O. sauteri. These insects are promising candidates for biological pest control in agriculture. O. strigicollis has limited distribution in the warmer coastal areas of the western regions of Japan, whereas O. sauteri is more widely distributed. We conducted genetic analyses using microsatellite markers and an isolation-by-distance analysis to understand the potential differences between these two species. We studied 494 individuals from 9 populations in the Chubu region of Japan, where they are sympatrically distributed. A significant positive correlation was observed between geographical distance and genetic differentiation (fixation indices; FST) in O. strigicollis, suggesting limited gene flow between populations. Contrastingly, no significant correlation was observed in O. sauteri, indicating a higher gene flow and larger population size. Thus, these results contribute to the development of biological control strategies for these species.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map which indicates the collection sites of the filed populations.Figure 1 long description.

Figure 1

Table 1. Collection records of the field populations of Orius sauteri and O. strigicollis used in this studyTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Table 2. Characteristics of eight microsatellite loci isolated from Orius strigicollis and O. sauteri, with primer sequences and annealing temperatures (Ta) (Hinomoto et al., 2009)Table 2 long description.

Figure 3

Table 3. Species composition of the Orius spp. for each sampling siteTable 3 long description.

Figure 4

Table 4. Genetic diversity of the 9 microsatellite loci in 8 populationsTable 4 long description.

Figure 5

Table 5. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test in each population of the Orius spp. in the Chubu region of JapanTable 5 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 2. Regression analysis between the geographical and genetic distances among the eight Orius strigicollis populations in the Chubu region of Japan based on eight microsatellite loci. Positive correlation was noted (p = 0.04; one-tailed test).Figure 2 long description.

Figure 7

Figure 3. Regression analysis between the genetic and geographical distances among the eight populations of Orius sauteri in the Chubu region of Japan based on eight microsatellite loci. No correlation was observed (p = 0.60; one-tailed test).Figure 3 long description.

Figure 8

Table 6. Pairwise FST of Orius strigicollis (below diagonal) and Orius sauteri (above diagonal) among the 8 populations in the Chubu region of JapanTable 6 long description.