Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T01:48:36.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morality in Practice: Dees, Crampton, and Brer Rabbit On a Problem of Applied Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

John R. Boatright
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In their article, “Shrewd Bargaining on the Moral Frontier,” J. Gregory Dees and Peter C. Crampton challenge us with a puzzle about deception in bargaining. How can the practice of misleading others about our settlement preferences—the terms on which we are willing to come to an agreement —possibly be justified? On any standard ethical theory, they claim, Brer Rabbit's trick of professing fear of the briar patch in order to avoid being eaten by the fox would seem to be wrong, and yet we read this tale to our children for their moral edification. The discussion by Dees and Crampton of this apparent inconsistency is penetrating, instructive, and well-informed. It is also a delight to read.

Information

Type
Replies
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1992, pp. 63 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bok, Sissela. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Random House, 1978.Google Scholar
Richard, Brandt B. “Toward a Credible Form of Utilitarianism.” In Hector-Neri, Castañeda and George, Nakhnikian, eds. Morality and the Language of Conduct. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Gregory, Dees J. and Crampton, Peter C.. “Shrewd Bargaining on the Moral Frontier: Toward a Theory of Morality in Practice.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 1 (1991), 135–167.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “Are Moral Considerations Overriding?” In Virtues and Vices. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Gregory, Kavka S. “When Two ‘Wrongs’ Make a Right: An Essay on Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics, 2 (1983), 61–66.Google Scholar
Gregory, Kavka S.Hcbbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Christine, Korsgaard M. “The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15 (1986), 325–349.Google Scholar
Anthony, Kronman T. “Contract Law and Distributive Justice.” The Yale Law Journal, 89 (1980), 472–511.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, Regan H.Utilitarianism and Co-operation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael. Common-sense Morality and Consequentialism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.Google Scholar