Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:24:20.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Call for Proposals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Other
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 202 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2012

References

REFERENCES

Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. 2006. Getting even or moving on: Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 653–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. 2009. Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34: 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodstein, J. D., & Butterfield, K. D. 2010. Extending the horizon of business ethics: Restorative justice and the aftermath of unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20: 453–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. 2008. After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33: 730–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radzik, L. 2009. Making amends: Atonement in morality, law, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, M., & Valdez, M. E. 2009. Contextual factors surrounding reputation damage with potentialimplications for reputation repair. Academy of Management Review, 34: 146–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M. U. 2006. Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar