Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T18:36:38.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Special Section on Accountability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Robert Phillips and
Shawn L. Berman
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Accountability, it would seem, is something that everyone would like to see more of. Citizens would like to have a more accountable government; teachers and parents would like to have more accountable students and schools; and clearly, stakeholders and commentators appear to desire more accountable corporations. One of the leading organizations concerned with improving the social and ethical performance of business is called simply, “AccountAbility” (http://www.accountability21.net/). The uniformity of such calls for greater accountability tempts one to see it as an unalloyed benefit to organizational performance and societal advancement.

Information

Type
Special Section on Accountability
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 2007, pp. 449 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Business Ethics Quarterly 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Jensen, M. 2002. “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A. 1992. “Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Processes.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J. S., and Tetlock, P. E. 1999. “Accounting for the Effects of Accountability.” Psychological Bulletin 125: 255–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, R., and Caldwell, C. B. 2005. “Value Chain Responsibility: A Farewell to Arm's Length.” Business and Society Review 110: 345–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, ed. Staw, B. and Cummings, L. L.Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 295–336.Google Scholar