Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T23:55:06.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leadership: A Discussion About Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Joseph C. Rost
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In this article, the author lists three problems that make any serious discussion about the ethics of leadership a very difficult undertaking. He then proposes a new, postindustrial paradigm of leadership. Using that understanding of leadership, two different sets of ethical analyses of leadership are possible: (1) those concerned with the process of leadership and (2) those concerned with the content of leadership (the changes proposed by the leaders and collaborators). In the end, the author suggests that the industrial paradigm of ethics (the 18th century liberal philosophy) is inadequate to deal with the ethical decision making that leaders and collaborators must do in the 21st century. Thus, a postindustrial paradigm of ethics must be developed to enable leaders and collaborators to make the tough ethical choices that will be demanded in the new millennium.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , January 1995, pp. 129 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1991). The Good Society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Block, P. (1993). Stewardship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Bottery, M. (1992). The Ethics of Educational Management. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Brown, M. T. (1991). Working Ethics: Strategies for Decision Making and Organizational Responsibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Denhardt, R. B. (1981). In the Shadow of Organizations. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Foster, W. (1886). Paradigms and Promises. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Etizioni, A. (1991). A Responsive Society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Etizioni, A. (1993). The Spirit of Community. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Harman, W. (1988). Global Mind Change. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After Virtue (2nd Ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Norte Dame Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, M. G. (1986). The Common Good. New York: Routledge & Legan Paul.Google Scholar
Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Roszak, T. (1953). Where the Wasteland Ends. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Sandin, R. T. (1992). The Rehabilitation of Virtue. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, J. (Ed.). (1989). Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, W. M. (1986). Reconstructing Public Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, R. (1986). Ethics in Policy Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar