Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T04:19:07.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2008

John Robb
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3DZ, UK; jer39@cam.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Time and change have been among the most widely discussed themes in archaeological theory, though they have varying fortunes in the vicissitudes of academic life. British and American anthropology, it has been observed, have long oscillated between history and evolution, between studying culture in its local context and in a long-term narrative. Following Steward and White rather than Kroeber and Boas, the New Archaeology's banner was evolution, and many of its theoretical goals were explicitly reductionist, for example, in viewing human actions as a local response to large-scale environmental conditions. Yet, at the same time, from its inception the New Archaeology also contained the seeds of a humanistic, historical approach (for instance, in tracing social stratification to chiefly power strategies to local, short-term political contexts).

Information

Type
Special Section: Time and Change in Archaeological Interpretation
Copyright
2008 The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research