Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T07:25:30.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III. Locke Versus Lowndes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2011

C. R. Fay
Affiliation:
Reader in Economic History in the University of Cambridge
Get access

Extract

There have been in England since 1600 three great monetary controversies. The first—and because of the place which it made for itself in literature, the most famous—was that between John Locke (1632–1704) and William Lowndes (1652–1724); the second arose over the Report of the Bullion Committee of 1810—for or against its adoption; the third was in the early eighteen-forties between the Currency and the Banking Schools. Locke, the Bullion Committee and the Currency School won. Lowndes’ proposal was rejected: the resumption of cash payments was decided upon in 1819: Peel's Bank Act of 1844 was a triumph for the Currency School. In each case the cause of “sound” money prevailed.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable