Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T09:47:59.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dehydration and Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2001

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] A.C. 789 the House of Lords held it lawful for a doctor to withdraw tube-delivered food and fluids from his patient in persistent vegetative state (pvs) even though this would cause death by dehydration. The most controversial aspect of the case was the further ruling by three of their Lordships that it was lawful even though the doctor’s purpose was not merely to withdraw what he regarded as a futile “medical treatment” but was precisely to kill the patient. As one of their Lordships, Lord Mustill, rightly recognised (even though he thought withdrawal ethically justifiable), this ruling left the law “morally and intellectually misshapen”, prohibiting intentional killing by an act but permitting intentional killing by omission.

Information

Type
Case and Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors 2001