^{page 129 note a–a} Om. in A, supplied from F

^{page 134 note a–a} Om. in A, supplied from F

^{page 134 note a–a} Interlined in a later hand

^{page 134 note b} Superscribed in a later hand

^{page 135 note 1} Holtzmann expands this as Gill (elmus), but Gill (ebertus) is far more likely (see below, no. 211 n. 2, and cf. nos. 224, 694–6).

^{page 136 note a–a} In the margin in a later hand in A

^{page 136 note b} Om. in D

^{page 137 note a–a} Om. in A, supplied from papal register as in Migne

^{page 138 note a–a} Om. in C, supplied from F

^{page 142 note a–a} Supplied conjecturally, only traces of the words surviving (see note 1)

^{page 142 note b} Four or five words totally lost by trimming of folio and fading (see note 1)

^{page 142 note c–c} Following closely Innocent IIPs general confirmation (Migne, ccxv. 1123–5), with addition

^{page 142 note d} Doubtful reading, corrected from Ms.? Sehnham

^{page 142 note e–e} Suspensions uncertain owing to trimming and fading (see note 1)

^{page 142 note f} Ms has undrdedis

^{page 142 note g} Ms has Varpoll'

^{page 142 note h} Doubtful reading

^{page 142 note i–i} As c–c, with addition

^{page 142 note j} Interlined

^{page 142 note k–k} As c–c, with additions

^{page 142 note 1} The text is missing in places owing to the trimming of the tops of ff 220–221, while at the top and bottom of f 22or the writing is so faded as to be illegible except under ultra-violet light.

^{page 142 note 2} See no. 165.